Sunday, February 24, 2019

#MeToo movement: Will anything change in reality?




No time in Nation’s history witnessed the situation when women, in such a large number, gathered courage to take on their perpetrators, by naming them publicly, which is in itself an unprecedented event towards paving a way to ensure better women’s safety and security for generations to come.

The recent few weeks have been instrumental in making a long-lasting impression in Indian patriarchal society, where girls/women are ashamed of coming forward to report sexual assault with themselves.

With #MeToo movement sweeping the nation; women from different walks of lives challenged the status quo, where victims are suppressed to stay mum, by naming the names of sexual predators on social media.

Although gradually, but #MeToo movement gathered momentum in India, and people from different fraternities come forward in the support of victims.

India’s #MeToo movement gathered impetus when model-turned actress Tanushree Dutta, during a TV interview, accused veteran Bollywood actor Nana Patekar of sexual harassment at the sets of film, Horn ok Please, in 2008.

After United States and China, it took a bit to take off in India, but gradually the movement has taken the nation by storm, as it was followed by hundreds of women from film, media, corporate and  other fraternities, exposing their harassers on Twitter and Facebook, as India media is giving special coverage to the movement in prime time show.

In what could be a metamorphic happening in India’s modern history, the women gathered courage to report their sexual harassment at work place by taking the names of people who walked away with it as nothing happened, and who also holds influential positions in their respective fields.

After Dutta, including actress Sona Mohapatra, Kangana Ranaut, Kate Sharma, film producer Vinta Nanda, journalists- Priya Ramani, Shuma Raha, Kanika Gahlaut,Suparna Sharma, Ghazala Wahab, Saba Naqvi, Kadambari Wade, Ruth David, Malini Bhupta, Janice Sequeira and Ira Trivedi- many women expressed their #MeToo moments in last few weeks over social media.
The movement took the country by shock as people from film celebrities like Nana Patekar, Annu Malik, Sajid Khan, Utsav Chakraborty, Vikas Bahl, Alok Nath, singer Abhijeet, director Subhash Ghai to notable author Chatan Bhagat, Suhel Seth and Rajya Sabha Member and former Minister of State for External Affairs M J Akbar have been accused of sexual harassment of their female colleagues at work place on social media.

Following the sexual harassment and rape allegations, Cine and TV Artistes’ Association (CINTTA) expelled actor Alok Nath from the organization, while owing to mounting pressure of #MeToo movement on central government, MJ Akbar, accused by 16 female journalists, who held various influential positions at Asian Age, The Telegraph and India Today, had to resign from the post.
Even corporate world didn’t remain untouched from waves of movement, as women in corporate sector also opened up to report their #MeToo moments, leading them to revisit their policy to ensure safety and security of female employees at work place.
Also, taking serious note on the issue, Maneka Gandhi, Minister of Women and Child Welfare appointed a high-level committee of judges to look into each and every case reported case under the #MeToo movement.

Given the recent developments revolving around women’s safety across the country, the actual storm of #MeToomovement began brewing inside victims of such incidents since December 2012 after brutal gang-rape of a Nirbhaya, which led to a nationwide outrage followed by government taking numbers of measures to ensure more safety for women.

However, the harsh reality is that like #Nirbhaya movement, #MeToo too remains stuck only to big cities, as women’s voice is still clamped down by male dominant society, when it comes to sexual assault in small cities, moffussil towns and villages. They still cannot gather courage to speak up as patriarchal society takes toll on them to keep them shut across the hinterland.
Following national-wide outrage after Nirbhaya rape tragedy, there were abrupt increase in number of cases reported pertaining to women assault/rape, however, as the movement lost its spate, situation returned to what it was before December 2012.

Being one of the most conservative societies, coupled with regional and language differences, and limited access to technology, the India’s #MeToo’s still strives to stretch its reach from urban elites to women in semi-urban and rural areas, where more than half of the country’s women live in vulnerable conditions.


Monday, July 3, 2017

Indian Jews: The Forgotten Diaspora


Which country will not boast of its pervasive Diaspora around the world? Strong bonds with Diaspora always strengthen a nation’s ability to exert diplomatic pressure over rest of the world, just as Israel did it beautifully, by getting hold of Jewish votes in United States.
Yes, there is only one nation on the Earth which denies its allegiance with people of its own origin- India.
 India hasn't been as reluctant in recognizing Hindus, Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Jain, and Buddhists of Indian origin living all across the world, as it has been for acknowledging more than 80 thousand Indian Jews living in Israel since decades.


India not only denied establishing diplomatic relations with Jewish state, but cut off allegiance with thousands of Indian Jews, who migrated there during 1950s-60s, after Israel opened its citizenship (Aliyah) to all Jews around the world.

Millions of Jews migrated from Europe, North and South America, Ethiopia, Iran, Iraq and India to land of three religions as it opened its border for them wholeheartedly after independence in 1948.

Most of Indian Jews lived in Cochin and Mumbai for more than thousand years since there exodus began 2000 years ago first by Christian crusaders, then Islam.

Wherever they fled for asylum around the globe, curse of anti-Semitism didn't stop them following for millennia, and the place where Jews found actual solace, where they never faced a single instant of anti-Semitism till to date is none other than India.

Major groups of Indian Jews, which comes under category of Sephadi Jews, include Cochin Jews, Bene Israel, Jews of Goa and Baghdadi Jews.


Cochin Jews (Spanish, Portuguese, Paradesi and British Jews) settled in Kerala as merchants and traders, whereas Chennai Jews arrived at Madras during 16th century following their expulsion from Liberia.
Jews of Goa include Portuguese Jews who fled to Portuguese Goa after the commencement of the Inquisition in Portugal.
The Jews arrived from Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan around 250 years ago settled in Surat, were called Baghdadi Jews.
Meanwhile, Bene Israel lived in Karachi, Sindh and Punjab region of undivided India. Many of them moved to Mumbai following partition, while others to Israel after 1948.


After 1948, Indian Jews, settled in different parts of Israel, flourished and assimilate with migrants of other nationalities. Most of them settled in Katamon in Jerusalem, Beersheba, Ramla, Dimona, and Yeruham.

Indian food, language, art, and culture, despite of huge cultural amalgamation, did find recognition in the land of migrants.

It has been India's too much infatuation for Arab countries and Indian Muslims, that no Indian administration, politician or social group ever tried to connect or communicate with Jews with Indian blood.


Indian National Congress, known as hardcore pro-Arab/Muslim Party, deliberately didn't extend any relations with Jewish country to safeguard their innate vote bank, whereas some efforts had been initiated by Hindu Nationalist Bhartiya Janata Party between 1998 and 2003 under Atal Bihari Vajpayee government. 

Hindu nationalist group Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, tried to further its affection for Israel and Jews since Israel’s Independence, but could not make it as political agenda, due its insignificance in Indian scenario.

Present government of Bhartiya Janata Party, backed by Hindu nationalist group Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh as its ideological backbone, again in a mood to romance Hindu-Jewish unity, as they there common enemy.

With Modi's visit to Jewish state (First by an Indian Prime Minister) on 4th and 5th July, Indian Jews in Israel and India hopes for reviving their historic connection with their country of origin.

On 5th July, Modi is going to address more than 10,000 Indian Jews in Tel Aviv, to trigger a spark a new Indo-Israel and Hindu-Jews relations.


Sunday, June 18, 2017

Modi’s Israel Visit a New Era of Hindu-Jewish Unity

Why does a tiny besieged Nation, Israel, raises heartbeats of Indian Statesmen? Why are India-Israel aggressively romanticizing relationships, when India is overtly pro-Arab and Israel a hardcore anti-Muslim state?

The roots of India's anti-Israel stand goes 7 decades back when India and Israel got their independence in 1947 and 1948 respectively.


Just after independence from British, out of anti-British-American disposition, because of centuries of servitude, Jawaharlal Nehru, first prime minister of India moulded India into Pro-Muslim-Communist-Soviet state, while Israel became American surrogate in Middle East.

After decades of isolation from Israel under Nehru-Gandhi regime due to pro-Arab policy, Impotent India socialist government, after the collapse of USSR in late 1980s, keeled down to United States, and the route they chose was none other than - Israel.

When USSR failed to aid India against economic and military crisis during 1991-92, India felt obliged to bow down to US via appeasing Jewish state.

In-spite of dramatic shift in India’s foreign policy, as a Pakistan's closest ally, US, seemed reluctant to help India economically and militarily in early 1990s financial crisis, leaving India with only one time-tested option for advanced and affordable military technology- Israel.

Amid all odds, Indo-Israel ties began to gain some momentum during Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party government led by Atal Bihari Vajpayee (1998-2004), with then Indian foreign minister Jaswant Singh (2000) visiting Israel followed by first visit of an Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2003.

However, all the advancements in bilateral relations made by BJP government were reversed with the return of UPA-1 (Left-Liberals) between 2004 and 2014. Nonetheless, imports of weapons and covert exchange of intelligence information continued.  

The string of bilateral visits has been resumed with the comeback of BJP government since May 2014, and has once again paved a way for rise of two pre-historic civilisations.
In last 3 years of Modi government, Indian home minister Rajnath Singh, President Pranab Mukherjee and foreign minister Sushma Swaraj have had been to Israel, while Israeli President Reuven Rivlin, defence Minister Moshe Ya’alon visited India.




As we celebrate silver jubilee of Indo-Israel ties, let’s hope Narendra Modi’s 3-day visit (first by an Indian Prime Minister) to Israel starting from July 4 would take the Hindu-Jewish unity to greater heights to lead the world.


Thursday, June 15, 2017

Illegal sand mafia killing Villagers in Sidhi district of Madhya Pradesh

Letter to Prime Minister of India by a common man

I want to put forward pathetic situation of me and my villagers since years due to illegal sand mining in Son River.

There is rampant illegal sand mining is going on in my village- Dithaura, Tehsil- Rampur Naikin, police station- Rampur Naikin, district- Sidhi, Madhya Pradesh, since years.

Rampant Sand mining is going on in Son River situated in Dithaura village. Due to which villagers’ lives has been turned into hell, as 24 hours sand mafias keep transporting sand from tractor and trucks from village roads to different places, and whosoever come in their way is killed, recently a journalist was killed by mafia.  

Villagers are living in threat of being killed 24 hours, but administration, police has turned blind eye, as police and local SDM are also involve in sand mafia gang.

Local officials of local police station Rampur Naikin, are also involved in illegal sand mining, they allow sand mafia to dig as much as they can, as police is also getting massive commission.

Even police protect sand mafias by guarding different check points so that no other police or any higher official could surprisingly come to inspect the situation.

Sand mafia have captured land of many villagers to transport sand forcefully and threaten them to kill if they complaint to any higher authority.

Villagers are totally helpless as mafia, police and administration are complicit in illegal business, and are leaving village as their lives has been turned into hell.

I request Mr. Prime Minister to take strict action with immediate effect to stop illegal sand mining to relieve villagers from this menace.

Thank You

Saturday, November 19, 2016

Rise of Hindu Nationalism: Gift of Gandhi-Nehru Dynasty


Rise of Hindu Nationalism in India after 70 years of Independence, is nothing something unexpected phenomenon, which is sweeping the nation since last two decades.
Its roots lie deep down in Mahatma Gandhi's social, political ideology which couldn't be digested by a large section of believers in Akhand Bharat (Undivided or Greater India) before and after British Rule.
Nothing apart was followed by Gandhi's ideologue Nehru, overlooking deep down tides of dissatisfaction taking shape of Hindu Nationalism.
After 1947 Gandhi's and Nehru's secularism didn't catch up masses that had been under foreign oppression since last 10 centuries, and paved a way to Rashtriya Swavamsewak Sangh jumping into politics.
Hindutva was never seen as an uniting social and political force in modern India until 1906 when Agha Khan founded Muslim League in undivided India.
Even after inception of Rashtriya Swavamsewak Sangh in 1925 by Keshav Baliram Hegdewar, Hindutva had not been a political entity, as Britishers, Gandhi, Nehru did not heed on it as a potential stakeholder.
All Indians had at that time was Congress Party as a secularist for whole India, on the other side was Muslim League for separate Muslims State to negotiate with Britishers.
Gandhi and Nehru talked about Idea of India which we have now, while Muhammad Ali Jinnah produced present day Pakistan, and no one listened to what Hindus wanted.
Since Mughal invasions till British Rule, and from partition of India until late 1970s Hindutva remained a largely neglected and unheard social and political entity.
Nonetheless, until late 1970s and early 80s religion remained out of political agenda of Congress and other left parties, as there was no significant amount of Muslim population (5%) left in divided India. As such Hindutva remained unruffled during this period and unknowingly swallowed silent and gradual process of secularisation among people and right wing parties.
But, after this period (late 1970s and 80s) as Muslim voters again started surging, Congress only major political party then, started their minority appeasement against the will of majority of population. Sensing soundless suppression of majority left RSS and other Hindu leaders emerge gradually up surging.
After rift in Congress party owing to rivalry between Indira Gandhi and Murarji Desai, rise of and fall of JP Narayan movement, and split of Janata Party left a void in opposition politics, which was successfully subsumed by Bhartiya Janata Party (Formerly Jan Sangh).
Meanwhile, after Death of Indira Gandhi, sensing its fading voters’ faith, Congress started politics of minority appeasement. This gave a sudden rise of Hindu Nationalism in late 1980s and early 1990s, with Ayodhya Ram Temple movement gaining momentum, well complimented by Rashtriya Swavamsewak Sangha and other hard core Hindu groups coming blatantly to represent and protect Hindus.
Meanwhile, Bharatiya Janata Party, backed by RSS, en-chased the demolition of Babari Mosque in 1992, to draw national attention, awakening consciousness of Hindus.

Rise of Bharatiya Janata Party, since then has been imbibing Hindu Nationalism, which has become contemporary bone of contention between two communities, which is constantly churning up Communal tension in India.

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

'Islamic Republic of Pakistan': A Failed State, Anathema on Islam

Single-mindedly and Mindlessly, Pakistan has positioned it self as most radical Anti-India power on the Planet, the only achievement to their credit, which protected their sovereignty from falling apart.

They lived up to one and only agenda of inflicting India by any means , with falling down to every possible level they could.

Transformed into jihad factory, what good Pakistani would have done to Kashmir (India Administered), which kept destabilizing the regions for more than half a century.

Without Kashmir there is no agenda for Pakistan to work upon. Citizens are starving for basic needs, and Army (De Facto political power in Pakistan) is blindly accumulating weapons on the mercy of superpowers to disrupt neighboring Giant.

All the Muslim neighbouring countries including Iran, Afghanistan have cut off with Pakistan. And after bearing brunt of Jihad, American power is is no longer interesting harbouring the terror powerhouse. Chinese power is still in tug of war with India and cannot it from jeopardizing its membership to United Nations and Commonwealth.

They have lost their credibility at all the international platform, no body trust them for their involvement in nurturing terrorism.

Calling special cabinet meeting to declare terrorist Burhan Wani, killed by Indian Army in Kashmir recently, as Pakistan's martyr, reflects their desperation to maintain fame of world's leading terror exporter.

Grave violations of Human rights, killing of Christians, Sikhs, Hindus, and other minority communities have raised international concerts regarding Pakistan’s destructive policies; it is no surprise if it received international sanctions sooner or later.

In last 2 years, India tried to resume dialogues at every possible level, but each time they opted out in unacceptable manner by resorting to non-state actor (Hurriyat Separatist Leaders).

Indian Prime Minister met his Pakistani counterpart at the sidelines of Ufa, and also paid a brief in December 2015 to Islamabad to normalise the situation, but Pakistan each time resorted inflicting terrorism.

Now the tension is at its peak Pakistan intensifying insurgency in Kashmir as they failed to all the attempts to disrupt India.

Meanwhile, in the recent terror attacks in France, USA, Bangladesh and Turkey, India and World must get together to fight the rising global Jihad before it gets too late.


Could there be religious minority in Secular Country ?

f country is secular aren't all religion equal? If all religions are equal then why special status should be given to any particular? And isn’t that amounts to widen the gap between people.

No Country gives special status to their minority on any grounds, and Conflict starts only when one religion, community or sect is given special privileges for political gain, while others are not.

A constitution which divides nation on sectarian ground cannot be secular. We do not hesitate quoting articles of Indian constitution proclaiming equal rights to all regardless of their caste, creed, colour and denomination, but special concessions on the basis of sect, cast and creed de facto not equality in any sense in secular State.

Special Rights to few and deprivation to rest is not democracy that ensured equal rights to all. Even Saudi Arabia and Iran also follow same suit with different treatment to different sects, and this is what India did and does to its minority community.
Even after bearing brunt of Partition, India didn't learn any lesson and laid foundations for another Pakistan per se.
How could I be patronizing those who killed my father? And this exactly what India did.
India not only patronized them but positioned them even higher against their enemies, who brutally killed each other just a few years back in 1947.

Two brothers separated out of their hatred cannot be brothers at any cost ever whether it was Yugoslavia, North and South Korea, North and South Sudan, Jewish and Arabs of Palestine, even once united Bangladesh and Pakistan and many more to come.
Does anyone dig his/her own grave, Yes India did it long ago.


Is film censorship getting worse in India?

Recent weeks witnessed high melodrama over censorship of film on drug abuse – Udta Punjab,produced by prominent filmmaker Anurag Kashyap.
Amid this entire episode of hullabaloo, the major concern emerges is the decline of freedom of creatively in the film industry, excessive involvement of political interest triggering threat to freedom of expression.
Including Shahid Kapoor starer Udta Punjab, which has had 94 cuts proposed by Central Board of Film Certifications (CBFC), there are dozens of movies which have been a prey of over-censorship in recent times. 

In recent past 2 years, a large numbers of films had gone through Film Certification Appellate Tribunal(FCAT) due to excessive cuts proposed by CBFC, which had not been so frequent in Indian film history.
Indian film industry has been an outspoken critic of contemporary issues in the nation which not only brought social awareness but helped government in shaping politics to resolve the problems.
Indian film industry, including Bollywood, Kollywood, and other regional cinema, always tried to bring such issues forward which were neglected by government, but overindulgence of censorship may prove to demoralize the filmmakers and producers on indulging such projects owing to  financial threats.
There is a growing concern among film fraternity on making films on such critical political and social issues.
In recent incidence, which triggered nationwide outrage, CBFC’s blatant objection on Udta Punjab based on surging drug abuse in the Punjab state of India sparked huge controversy, with whole film industry registered a stronger objection on CBFS’s arbitrary decision. The objections were known to be politically motivated to suppress the freedom of expression of film industry.
Anurag Kashyap had gone to high court when CBFC did not pass the film without any cuts. CBFC’s officials absurd attitude and the chief of CBFC Pankaj Nehlani’s open political interest definitely endangers the film industry’s freedom in India.

Censor Board curbing freedom of expression

Not only Udta Punjab, but dozens of such controversy erupted in last 2 years due to unwanted objections of Censor Board. Film which faced either total ban or had to remove substantial scenes include Mohalla AssiThe Painted HouseThe Mastermind Jinda SukhaKaum De HeereUnfreedomand Main Hoon Rajinikanth, En Dino Muzaffarnagar, Dance of Democracy: Battel for Benaras, NH10, No Fire Zone: In the Killing Fields of Sri Lanka, Veerappan, Aligarh.
While, foreign movies that had to face censorship include India’s Daughter50 Shades of Grey, James Bond’s Spectre, The Jungle Book

Veerappan

Directed by Ram Gopal Verma, it was a biopic on dacoit Veerappan. Although the film was granted ‘A’ citification, still CBFC objected several dialogues referring former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi by LTTE chief Prabhakaran. The reason given by CBFC was the threat of hurting sentiments of Tamil.

Aligarh

A national wide social media outrage erupted when Aligarh, a movie based on homosexuality, was given ‘A’ certificate. The movie, directed by Hansal Mehta, is based on the true story of AMU professor Dr Ramchandra Siras. It was however released with several cuts proposed by the Board.

En Dino Muzaffarnagar

The 147-minute documentary film based on 2013 Muzzaffanafar Hindu-Muslim riots was denied certifications on the grounds of danger to national security and harmony. Upholding Board’s decision, Film Certification Appellate Tribunal said, that the film is highly critical of a particular political party.

Dance of Democracy: Battle for Benaras

Another documentary film based on 2014 electoral fight between Narendra Modi and Arvind Kejriwal, directed by Kalam Swaroop was also refused certification due to inflammatory speeches by politicians that may cause communal tension. The filmmakers moved the Delhi High Court against the ban.

NH 10

Anushka Sharma starrer NH 10 also went through trouble with CBFC due to a couple of violent scenes and use of abuse words. Director Navdeep Singh in a statement to media said that when they went to get their certificate, half the members wanted to ban the film.

The Jungle Book

Not only Indian, but foreign movies have also been a prey of over-censorship of CBFC board in recent time. Surprisingly, child movie ‘The Jungle Book’, directed by Jon Favreau under the banner of Disney, was awarded U/A certification which meant that child under 12 have to be accompanied by adult. The decision drew worldwide criticism. Board claimed that the 3D effects in film were scary for young children.

Spectre

James Bond series film Spectre was asked to remove kissing scenes by 50 percent, which drew universal criticism. Daniel Craig’s movie was one of the biggest blockbusters in 2015.



Wednesday, June 22, 2016

High time to unite against terrorism or detonate the world

No country immune to terrorism
In globalized world, no country is immune to terrorism, whatsoever powerful you are. It’s again wake-up call to civilized world to get united in war against terror or succumb to their own vicious game of thrones.
Double standards in dealing with terrorism must be stopped. In the race of dominance millions of people have being killed from far East, Middle East to far West.

There are no terror organisations not be overpowered when whole world gets united. But the need of hour is to start thinking out of short term vested interest and save humanity from plunging into ever detonating world.
In one week, terror attacks In Tel Aviv on 8th June and in Orlando on 12th June claimed 4 and 50 lives respectively, which successfully swept World from waves of threat and abhorrence.
In last one and half year dozens of terrorist attacks from Brussels to Orlando (US) left the western world in a great sense of fear growing radical Islamic within their territory.
Dozens of journalists were shot dead in French magazine’s office Charlie Hebdo in January 2015 in French capital. Again in Paris hundreds were massacred by terrorists in November 2015 which proved to be the biggest terror attack in Europe in a decade. It was followed by mass shooting in San Bernardino (US) on 2nd December 2015 with 14 causalities, while 32 lost their lives in another deadly explosion at Brussels Airport on 22nd March 2016.
All these attacks drew worldwide concern of rising Islamic terrorism and intensified military action against ISIS strong hold in Syria but all lasted until outrage vaporized and victims silenced.
There are no terror activities undergoing without financial and political backing no matter which place they are. Whether it’s Al-Qaida, Taliban or Mujaheddin all such groups were created at some point strategically by some State intentionally to wage proxy war against another State to expand dominance in the region, which claimed millions of lives since decades.
Modern Jihad:  Superpowers pawns on world’s chessboard
It’s of course well-known that jihadist group Mujaheddin was creation of US during late 1970s to trigger proxy war against Soviet power as US did not want to confront USSR directly. Ever since Soviet retreated from in 1989 at the verge of their collapse, the countries in the regions are confronting with eternal epidemic of modern terrorism called Jihad.
As Soviet retreated from Afghanistan, the Mujaheddin were transformed turned into Taliban by neighboring country Pakistan to wage proxy war against India, that left hundreds of thousands killed in last 3 decades.
Since the modern terrorism incepted in very Islamic world (Afghanistan) by Western power (US) against eastern bloc (Former Soviet Union), the countries adjoining the region have had definitely been prone to be affected, which took the modern era of Islamic Jihad from Afghanistan, Iraq to Syria and all over the world.
Not only India but many countries like Afghanistan, Israel, have also been a consistent victim of terrorism but the western powers remained indifferent towards the issue as they loved to play double sided game.
Since 26/11, the US, although, been turned into victim mode as it bore the brunt of its own patronized version of Islamic jihad called Mujaheddin, it unintentionally went to produce even more deadly ISIS by invading Iraq in 2003. In addition, Arabian Peninsula has also been perpetually involved in fighting proxy war between Shia (Iran) and Sunni (Saudi Arabia) to strengthen the dominance in Middle East.
These groups have being funded and used by different States against others States at different period of time in last 3 decades.
Several resolutions were passed in United Nations Security Council and General Assembly but all in vain. But now when repeated terrorist attacked enraged the western world (Paris, Brussels and US attacks) they did not take much time to call collective war against menace considering India as perpetual victim of that.
Now is the time for whole world to get united against war against humanity or face even worst consequences.

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

2 Years of Modi: 'Branding India as a Global Master'

Rise of Modi or India
Keeping aside all statistical affirmative indicators of India's growth, in last 2 years, the present government has unquestionably been successful in framing Nation’s image as an emerging lumbering Elephant in South-East Asia.
Not to mention the accomplishments and actions may differ from promise, nevertheless New Delhi, so far, drew worldwide attention as an unfolding economic power. 

It can undeniably be a unique coincidence of emergence of BJP government, which completes 2 year in power on 25th of May, 2016, and surge of global crisis.
000_Del6377111-e1419003097975© Times of Israel
Rise of ISIS, China's de-accelerated economy, Western stagnancy and fall of global oil prices, complimented the incumbents, who came with full majority for the first time Indian electoral history (Only party after Congress), to stage an optimistic image of Country at international stage.

Besides emergence of new era of terrorism, fall of regime after regime in Middle East and refugee/migrants crises in Middle East, North Africa and Europe have been focal point of global discourse.

Meanwhile, India kept itself occupied in scaling the length and breadth of economic world.
Mapping the East and West

Less than 2 years of his tenure he scaled world form Magnolia in Far East to far Seychelles off East Africa, where no Indian premier ever paid attention. He led India emerge as a mediator power between western and eastern power.
Modi, not only took lead in aligning the far eastern countries like Magnolia, Seychelles, Indian oceans island countries Mauritius, Fiji, and Central Asian countries etc, which although do not have significance on world map, but do play keyhole in shaping India's aspiration of permanent member of UNSC.

After new premier swept to power in 2013, China embarked itself in eradicating deep rooted corruption in bureaucracy, intensifying cracked down on public and media outrage, while, Obama administration could not heed beyond sanctioning Russia’s re-conquest of Eastern Europe,  and unbalancing Arabian peninsula by tabling the nuclear agreement.

On one hand, Putin invested most his energy in reviving SOVIET legacy, US has been successful in inundating former SOVIET stronghold Cuba, most of the world discourse remained between migrant and UK's realignment from EU.
On the other hand, sensing the vacuum in global dias, Modi slated himself as a joining link between East and West, emerging as a leader with influential and decisive power.
Balancing the Middle-East

Since mid 2014, as Saudi's oil dominance has been on downhill, and Iran's nuclear deal imbibed another kind of contention in Arabian Peninsula. At the same, time, Modi, not only successfully balanced China and USA, but Shia and Sunni along with Jewish State, with recent his visits to Saudi Arabia and Iran, and foreign minister’s Israel visit.

Even he has been successful in mapping the largest landlocked part of world, central Asia, and with Chabahar port agreement with Iran, Modi assured India's opening in Central Asia, which has been neglected from global arena after fall of SOVIET, even having a big chunk of natural resources there.

Last 2 years has seen far intensive foreign policy under Modi administration which India never seen before.

And, amid the entire furore Modi is going to address joint session of US Congress, the world’s most power full legislative body, which decided the discourse of world for decades.

However, even after making felt India's presence from Far East to West, Modi administration has been failed in countering not only Pakistan, but Nepal which is considered to be India’s little brother for centuries.


Although India has presence in African nations, but still very less aligned with Latin American nations, where still Indian needs to search grounds.